Dear crypto writers: No one wants to read your ChatGPT-generated trash

cointelegraph.com:

There was a time when anything generated by ChatGPT was fascinating. 

To fathom that a super-intelligent robot was writing poetry, drafting legal documents or even acting as a personal life coach was mind-boggling.

As if each prompt was a window into a kind of shared human consciousness.

That was the novelty then, at least. But it’s been nine months since GPT-3 and almost five months since the launch of GPT-4.

In May, a crypto firm shared a 10-minute video presentation it had whipped up about artificial intelligence’s role in increasing business productivity (in the hopes of coverage).

Ironically, the presenter was an AI-generated avatar reading from a script most likely lifted straight out of ChatGPT. It took all of 20 seconds to close it.

Related: Worldcoin: Should you let Sam Altman scan your eyeballs for WLD?

Oh, was it written by a bot? No worries, send it to my AI transcriber.

Another great example came in recently from a colleague who received a pitch from a third party — offering an article on how to use MetaMask more efficiently.

The 1,159-word explainer discussed six cold wallets that could be connected to MetaMask, a potentially relevant subject given the recent spate of hot wallet hacks, such as the $23 million hack of the Bitrue crypto exchange on April 14.

At first glance, the article was decently written. It had an introduction, a sub-introduction and six subheadings for each individual cold wallet, followed by a conclusion. There wasn’t a single grammatical error.

Packed with facts but void of any personality, flair or human element. No impactful conclusions.

“Each of these wallets has its unique features and advantages, so it’s important to do your research and choose the one that best suits your needs,”